GCU Dancer on the Midway
Paul Wright's blog
Recent Entries 
24th Sep 2009, 11:53 pm - Meta: link blogging and ads
Link blog?

I keep a sort of mini blog over at Delicious. It's a collection of links I want to save, plus a short description. On LiveJournal, there's a feed of it at [info]pw201_links, but there's no point posting comments there, as I won't see them. [info]andrewducker regularly posts batches of his links to his LJ, and they often create some interesting discussion. I wondered whether I should do the same, or whether that would mean death was too good for me, as it is for those people who use Loudtwitter to post their "tweets" to LJ. I'd probably post links once a week or in batches of 10, whichever happened sooner. What do you think?

Poll #1462193
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 14

Should I make link blog entries?

View Answers

Hell yes
1 (7.1%)

Yes
7 (50.0%)

I don't mind
5 (35.7%)

No
1 (7.1%)

Hell no
0 (0.0%)



LJ links up with Google ads

As you might have seen over on [info]news, LJ have formed a partnership with Google, allowing users who pay for their journals to place Google ads on them and earn a bit of money (LJ itself probably makes money off people who sign up, they're not taking a cut of the money for people viewing the ads).

I won't be doing this, as the small amount of money I might make from ads isn't worth the annoyance to my readers. As someone whose comment I can't find said, it looks like LJ have done this to keep up with other services like Wordpress, who offer ads as an option. SUP bought out LJ because LJ apparently is blogging in Russia, so perhaps this is part of a trend. I hope they might do more "serious blogging" stuff as opposed to social networking stuff: I'd like to see LJ on my own domain working properly, comment feeds (so I don't have to do it myself with Python scripts and gaffer tape), Google Analytics, and a pony.

Of course, the best thing about [info]news postings is the hordes of whining commenters and the responses mocking them for whining. Pages 6 and 7 are particular rich in put-downs and image macros. It's interesting to see that the "bugger off to Dreamwidth" response is getting popular: DW has made a name for itself as the place where you flounce to because The Man is keeping you down, Man. Fandom folk are pretty self-aware, so they mock this stereotype themselves. All good fun.
I've produced a new version of LJ New Comments which works with Dreamwidth again: looks like they changed how comments are marked up at some point.
4th May 2009, 04:35 pm - LJ New Comments: Dreamwidth support
Though I value its role in motivating LJ to be less stupid, I have not yet accepted Dreamwidth as my personal saviour. However, seeing as a lot of people have and one of them asked me about it, I've updated LJ New Comments to support it.
This page was loaded Nov 22nd 2009, 12:51 pm GMT.